1. I helped with the planning of the video. I helped come up with the idea that our video be focused around Sean’s interview and to have b-roll of the IMRC and the equipment he was talking about. I also directed a lot of the shots of the b-roll and created the rough edit of the film. The whole group was involved in the planning of the project. Claudio, Andreas and Than scheduled and ran the interview with Sean. Carsyn directed some b-roll shots and completed the final edit. Than also did a rough edit as a back up. 
2. A. Yes, our group had all the equipment needed and we were all eager to make a good video.

      B. We completed the sound exercises in lab if that’s what you mean. The actual audio for the video we did on our own.

      C. Yes, Sean made sure to run any of the equipment we needed for filming in order to get the shots also the audio for the interview came out smoothly thanks to Claudios mic.

3.    We were all respectful of each other’s ideas and everyone had a voice during the filming and planning. We were all ok with the roles we took on which most of them mixed together. Everyone really did a little bit of everything which made the project interesting and more rewarding. If someone couldn’t make certain dates to work, then the others covered for them and kept them in the loop by providing a description of what was done that day and access to all the footage that was taken.

4. I would allow more time for this project. The goal is to make a film for a real company. 3 weeks to find a client, find time to shoot that works for the client and at least a few of the group members who also are full time students, and come up with a final edit for that client is a ridiculously small amount of time. So I guess more time would be the best thing.

B. 

1. I believe we got the message across in our video well in a professional and visual pleasing way. The messages are what the IMRC is, who is welcome, and what they are able to do there.
2. Are pacing of shots are nice. None of them are too long which keeps the viewer interested and the shots themselves are all unique, there is never a shot of the same thing other than when cutting back to Seans interview. The interview and background music are the only sounds in the video. The music is there but not overpowering or distracting of Sean’s interview. The interview sound came out clear and the audio was cut so that there wouldn’t be so many “uhhs, and umms,” but you wouldn’t be able to tell that they were ever there.
3. Like I said the sound is good
4. The quality of the dialogue is pretty good sound wise and the content quality of the dialogue also also good. Sean gets the message across well.
5. The video appears inviting and fun which is what we aimed to make the IMRC look like. The whole goal of the video was to provide Sean with a promotional film that he could use to get more customers inside the IMRC. I think we’ve done that.

C.  Sean liked it.

• Saved: R3